This article’s going to be a bit about some non-game theory and my developing understanding of romantic/sexual dynamics.
But first, some housekeeping:
No field report this past weekend, caught a cold and didn’t have the motivation to spread it to others by going out. Had a semi-major slip in the pmo recovery and found I had a cavity from sugar over-consumption (I’d been using sugar as a crutch to recover from pmo), so now I’m starting the reset period for both sugar and pmo addictions to cut them from my life, more or less. Already it seems to be showing in my physique and skin, a significant difference now with not consuming sugar.
Reached out to some bars in my area, aiming to snag a job for a month or more to get experience and comfortability in the night. I’ve got an excellent work ethic but will be leaving the town right after the semester ends to travel the country (and take a trip to our beloved Japan!), so we’ll see if bars bite on having me.
Now to the good stuff:
Seductresses are, by definition, women who attempt to persuade men (or women) to go astray (from a goal). Usually we see this done with an appeal to one of the man’s desires, such as the strong drive for physical intimacy.
For me, from childhood up to realizing female nature, the attractive seductress was a pinnacle fantasy ideal. I have reasonable confidence I’m not alone; the appeal of being flirted with and tempted by someone attractive to join in illicit activity could be quite broad, but I recall seeing it in modern popular culture, particularly softcore-porn anime, “adult” and non-adult games, visual novels, young adult fiction, and more. To my knowledge, it has increased in the past decade and likely will continue to as more guys get sucked into video games and other mind-numbing testosterone-sucking behaviors.
Historically in literature, we’re much more likely to meet a meek and mild woman than a femme fatale, which I speculate could be from the nature of women themselves. The seductress archetype, which we see in Calypso and the sirens in the Odyssey, Delilah in the Bible, and vampires in greek mythology, seems to fit that Madonna-Whore dichotomy often defining the uninitiated man’s understanding of female nature.
While seductresses are seen as deviating from the norm of a society where women typically wait for men to act, when we factor in the Red Pill, seductresses make more sense: they are simply more aggressive with embodying hypergamic traits. These women know what they want, and they chase after it in a more-or-less calibrated way. There is a man or men in their sights which they see as having valuable resources, and they will act to gain access to those resources.
I frequently see a misunderstanding and mis-portrayal of seductresses in fiction, often intended to titillate the (male) consumer but falling flat by failing to factor in the critical features of such characters. I myself, as a past creator of erotic fiction[1], have made many such misunderstandings and written several unrealistic seductresses.
In my own experience when writing a story, this typically happens in the vein of thinking “It would be so awesome to have someone aggressively trying to seduce me/the protagonist (because I want to be seduced)” and in writing such a character the question “why does this character want to seduce the protagonist” often goes unanswered.
As a result, the seductress, used weakly, can feel like unrealistic wish fulfillment to the readers. As I’m considering this pitfall to the trope, I realize that a more story-pertinent way to use the concept is to have the temptress be a legitimate threat to the protagonist’s goals.
Why would a woman so feminine and attractive and of such seemingly high smv go after a guy who is lower smv than her?
While romance is fun to consider, and you can’t account for the randomness of attraction, it seems to me more like denying reality now knowing the Red Pill.
Most women won’t move even for very high-value men, they will wait. The few women who move, move for a reason. All those historical temptresses were chasing high-value men, brave warriors at the peak of their age. In notable literature, they weren’t seeking weak teenagers who still needed spoonfeeding until closer to modern-day portrayals[2].
Now, after coming to understand the basics of red pill, I’ve realized in order to have even a minuscule chance of bringing my “being seduced” fantasy to life, I need to flip the script. I need to be that high-value man. Moreover, I must become the charming seducer rather than waiting to be seduced.
If you’re reading this and relating to it, check out some of these guys I link to, don’t feel like you have to be stuck in a pit. It’s a grave dug by your own inaction and lack of knowledge. Choose action rather than passivity. Masculine dominance instead of feminine submission.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
[1] You can find my writing if you’re persistent, but I can’t recommend it; the stories are decent at best and boringly, annoyingly naive at worst and all have some degree of fetish included. Currently on hiatus, indefinitely. Curious about how RP ideas could affect character dynamics though.
[2] My mind goes to some of the reportrayals of mythical characters by Rick Riordan in his young adult novel series. The protagonist was made to be emotionally relatable, so it seemed like the seductresses were chasing a guy with low value, or (more accurately) a value that only they could see—mostly different from how the SMV we understand works.
You must be logged in to post a comment.