Nash Is Right: Be a “Dangerous Man”

I realize I’ve been sitting on my laurels more or less. Part of that is due to either having oversatiation from porn/video games or recovering from a porn-orgasm-masturbation addiction with the help of Mark Queppet (and not wanting to distract myself from the (game and non-game) inner work by chasing skirt) (self-reminder that I should write a post about this).
But taking a little bit of action is much more galvanizing than waiting for the “right” moment to take major action before taking any action (I will note to post about this too). As an example of this, I found that shirking my homework today to pick up a necklace and reading some daygame stuff (including some inspiring stuff for beginners from Dating Architect) allowed me to break through some of my personal inhibitions to just going out and approaching. This was also helped by hearing a fellow pickup artist I discovered recently recount how he approaches almost all girls once he leaves his home (if that’s true, I’d pin him at more than the number of approaches he estimated his experience to be).

At this point in the article I would apologize for the tangentiality in my sentences (i.e. having so many parenthetical phrases), but perhaps I can sell it to you my reader as practice for understanding girls. I’d also like to highlight my attempts to be like RedQuest in having more links in this post than a TVTropes article. But anyway, moving on!

Here’s the meat and potatoes: reading Nash’s blog is like living a dream; a common thread in his blog posts involve him positioning himself as someone sexually dangerous, wolfish, predatory, but with just enough civility to hold back in public. Most successful players I’ve seen have similar threads about taking the lead and being strong men with a distinct “edge”. That’s a significant part of what I think distinguishes a player from being “boyfriend material” or even “beta”, in a girl’s eyes. Does it seem like an adventurous time, where she can ride the fantasy-line between “falling into his trap” and “barely escaping unflowered”? Or does this guy seem like a boring dude just trying to get lucky?

Honestly, I’m worried about whether or not I’ll be able to become as leader-like and “dangerous” as Nash is. He’s a superb example, living the life so many of us young guys dream (and play erotic video games) about. But today I got a solid reference experience that gives me hope. And I have the inspiration from reading so many of his blogs that I want to make one happen while I’ve got the idea blender swirling on high gear.

After seeking rejection to add to my pile (but not recording any of it yet; I will truly “get serious” late this April) before and in the cafeteria, I sat down with a simple, smart but modestly-dressed girl to eat a salad. I didn’t open with a compliment but quickly followed with one, embracing the idea of being a “player” and shooting as many shots as I could, as a brief flick of her eyes indicated interest in this new imposing guy who just sat across from her. We chatted about some various things, boring things, I forget most of it but distinctly recall the spark of awe and interest when I said something along the lines of being a “dangerous man.” Maybe I can be a dangerous man. She lingered at the end of our interaction when she mentioned she had to go for groceries, but I got sidetracked in the conversation (should have gotten the number, but I wasn’t super interested in her anyway).

And you, the one reading this blog, if you aren’t yet a “dangerous man,” let it stew in you. Let the idea dwell until you read enough and hear enough and see enough and get frustrated enough to act, to decide to take on the “dangerous man” persona and be the kind of men that make women’s underclothes damp from expectation.

Mostly unrelated, but here’s another interesting bit that Nash says:

I will talk about my Kiss Close. It’s not particularly complicated – I just step in and kiss her. I try to do it on every first date, often in the middle of the date. I have recommended this to other guys. I say that even when the kiss is rejected, that it is a form of “communication” that makes it clear I’m not a “friend.” It sets up sexual expectations. Once I have already made a sexual move, if she comes out again, she knows what to expect.

I say all this. I believe it. I still like that strategy, and yet… it’s a little crude. I can see that too.

https://daysofgame.com/theory/hello-motherfckers-satori-pua-daygame-decoded-review/

I’ll be thinking about this point for a while. It goes hand-in-hand with the “dangerous man” thing.

Again inspired by Nash, let’s add a closing line to these blog posts. I think a fitting one is:
Keep Rolling

Author: NightRoller

Learning, growing game practitioner. Find me at https://nightrollergame.wordpress.com/

4 thoughts on “Nash Is Right: Be a “Dangerous Man””

  1. Hey man.

    > Here’s the meat and potatoes: reading Nash’s blog is like living a dream; a common thread in his blog posts involve him positioning himself as someone sexually dangerous, wolfish, predatory, but with just enough civility to hold back in public

    I can add some clarity to this. I absolutely cultivate this in girls, I do. It is a clear, literal, intentional theme I nurture as she and I build a story together. I am the Wolf. The Dangerous Man, the Strong Man. The Beast. These days… the Monster. I have several girls that call me “Monster.” One girl calls me Ass Monster… which I am proud of.

    But girls don’t say to this to men that are “too” dangerous, or “too” monstrous. This is all “curated fantasy” and role play.

    Lots of guys are *actually* much more dangerous than me. What I am doing is actually about BALANCE.

    I am older, clean, successful. I have a nice place (not too fancy, but nice). I have an artsy side. I can cook. I have two charming, beautiful cats (not so dangerous, in some ways). So the girls see all THAT, and I walk them past it, into me being “dangerous.” They HEAR dangerous, the FEEL IT when I pin them to the wall of the elevator and make out with them. But they SEE how clean and careful I am with them too.

    And they love the BALANCE. You get it?

    This is actually a kind of PUSH/PULL. I am affection, sensitive, etc (PULL). But I don’t really talk about that… I just do it. And for BALANCE, I stack on “dangerous” and “strong” (PUSH).

    Push/pull is about BALANCE… and it is a mega lesson of Game.

    If you’re not already clean and well structured, going on about how you’re a “big, dirty, hairy monster” won’t be attractive. It’s when I show her BOTH, all that BALANCE… that my themes of dangerous, and beast, and monsters are so welcomed by the girls.

    If I want to go one step farther… I’d say it’s about BALANCE (yes) across POLARITY (opposite things). To add “dangerous” to “dirty” wouldn’t be any balance. And to add “mild” to “moderate” is too “middle of the road.” But to BALANCE the “fighter” with the “dancer” combines two very different things, and gives balance across a wide range.

    > taking the lead and being strong men with a distinct “edge”

    This is a more basic lesson, and a great place to start. Do this first. The work on “contrast across traits” later. For now, you might notice this “good balance” in men you see that are attractive in these contrasting ways.

    > whether or not I’ll be able to become as leader-like and “dangerous” as Nash is.

    I would focus on the leader first. Good, solid leaders know how to plan and escalate. Those kind of men get laid. Add APPROACHING, and now you’re in the top 10% of men.

    I am doing a lot of FANTASY work… I am totally for real, but I am building “fantasy experiences” for these girls (and for myself)… and that isn’t necessary to be in the top 10%. I am trying to do one-of-kind seduction level work… you can do very well without understanding what I am trying to do.

    But what I do works… and the girls love it, they learn to speak the language of my kind of seduction, and start calling me “Beast” and “Mr Wolf” and it creates good sexual polarity vs them… and they are always “Little Girl” or “Pretty Thing” or “Beautiful One.” I am doing Beauty (feminine) and the Beast (masculine), over and over. And it works – masc/fem always works.

    And there could be something to learn for guys watching the style of seduction I like to create.

    Viva Night Roller. Viva daygame.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yeah, most normal middle class and up girls are repelled by most classes of “dangerous” men (the homeless, street drug dealer enforcers, the insane, the unhinged, etc.). But, lots of girls are attracted by some classes of “dangerous” men (military is the most obvious here… lots of girls like men in uniform… lots of chicks have a thing for cops, too).

      When girls say “dangerous” I think they often mean “emotionally dangerous” and/or “not boring.” Most guys are boring to most girls. The ones who aren’t “boring” are often crude or gross. Trick is getting to “sexy dangerous.” Which is what/who a lot of the heroes in romance novels are.

      Most guys are boring, https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2020/01/12/how-not-to-be-boring-on-dates/, and most girls are bored. Guys are often trained by their families, by their teachers, by their society to be boring and “polite.” Most girls want the right kind of exciting.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. >>I’d also like to highlight my attempts to be like RedQuest in having more links in this post than a TVTropes article.

    It’s good to cite your sources and show people where to go for more info! Most people don’t know shit, and they make assertions unbacked by evidence. There’s a shallowness that citing improves.

    Show us where you come from and where you are going.

    Most people are very surface, but that doesn’t mean you have to be.

    Couple of broken links in the post…

    >>This was also helped by hearing a fellow pickup artist I discovered recently recount how he approaches almost all girls

    >>I will truly “get serious” late this April) before and in the cafeteria

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the mention on broken links! I linked the URL to edit them instead of the actual pages (viewing the real website/using real urls is more convoluted than I’d expect for WordPress).

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started